Supreme Court held for the first time that the allottee of a flat can be entitled to compensation for delay from the Builder on the basis of prevailing market value of similar flats in the vicinity.   Read News Related to this Case:  Hindustan Times Vakilno1.com Watch Blog Related

The case pertained to the highly prestigious grant-in-aid project assistance of India to the Republic of Myanmar for construction/upgradation of 69 second world war era bridges and approach roads in Myanmar. The contract was terminated on account of slow progress. The Indian Contractor challenged the termination by filing a

A petition to bring forth the suspension of sentence during the pendency of the Appeal before the Hon’ble High Court of Kerala. The petition examined the powers of the High Court under Section 389(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973; to look at the totality of circumstances including

A writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution was preferred because an LLM student failed to appear in his last attempt in two papers of his LLM Course because the Respondent preponed the examination schedule without giving personal communication to the Petitioner and the same was simply published

This matter has its roots in the litigation initiated by the Respondents, almost five decades ago, before the Ld. Forest Tribunal, Palghat, challenging the vesting of their lands in the Government under Kerala Private Forest (Vesting and Assignment) Act,1971. Though the Ld. Forest Tribunal dismissed the petition, the Hon’ble

A Writ Petition that challenged the arbitrary, unfair and unreasonable decision of the immigration authorities at Calcutta Airport to illegally deport an American citizen, in possession of a valid passport and visa, without affording any reason. This Writ Petition invoked basic fundamental rights available to every human being, inter

Petition challenging dismissal of Writ Petition by the Hon’ble High Court of Kerala, which sought stay and setting aside of proceedings to entrust the development, operation and management of the Thiruvananthpuram International Airport to the successful bidder, i.e. Adani Enterprises on the ground that the dispute was covered under

Erstwhile Ruler of Travancore filed an appeal against the judgment dated 31.01.2011 of High Court of Kerala, whereby the High Court had held that the Ruler of Travancore is not entitled to manage the affairs of Sree Padmanabhaswamy Temple after 1991 i.e. after the death of Sri Bala Rama

The arbitration pertained to a claim on broadcasting fees with reference to uplinking of India-based terrestrial channels through a Thai satellite.